Readability Screening Tools
A number of readability tools have been developed to determine if text is complex. However, the tools are limited in their ability to measure the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information.
| Tool | Uses | Limits |
|---|---|---|
Fry |
Calculates reading age in years by counting the number of syllables and number of sentences. |
Does not assess content. Requires block test and cannot assess narrative with headers, sub-headers, bullets or pamphlets. |
Flesch-Kincaid |
Computes readability based on the average number of syllables per word and the average number of words per sentence. The score in this case indicates a grade-school level. Built into Microsoft Word. |
Doesn’t allow for bullets or formatting. Results are inconsistent and don’t reflect how text is understood. Does not assess content. Requires block test and cannot assess narrative with headers, sub-headers, bullets or pamphlets. |
| SMOG | Method used to determine the reading level of written materials. Computes a grade-level score based on complexity of text. |
Doesn’t allow for bullets or formatting. Results are inconsistent and don’t reflect how text is understood. “Mississippi” would be counted as a complex word. Does not assess content. Requires block test and cannot assess narrative with headers, sub-headers, bullets or pamphlets. |
None of these readability tools can tell you:
- how complex the ideas are
- whether or not the content is in a logical order
- if the vocabulary is appropriate for the audience
- if there is a gender, class or cultural bias
- if the design is attractive and helps or hinders the reader
- if the format or type style is easy or hard to read